So, forgive me if my msn bugger up once in a while, i'm having to use pidgin now. Ah well.
Nothing much to be said or done, except a nasty red ink stain and a nice desk.
Hoping you have a really nice desk somewhere.
Friday, June 11, 2010
Thursday, June 10, 2010
Nirvana or Bust
It's like gambling, actually, very much so. Almost guaranteed to lose, and guaranteed to lose, in the long run? I could be very much wrong. But i don't need to know the meaning of very big things if the details do no add up.
"Anything is only as good as the sum of it's parts"
Not an actual quote by anyone famous quotable, but i like the ring.
I also hate the canteen's doughtnuts. Eugh. Plus the icing. The icing is dead set horrible. Too much sugar to be of any goodness. Back to "real" doughnuts it is.
Hoping you never, ever, eat something as bad and as overpriced for it's value as that.
"Anything is only as good as the sum of it's parts"
Not an actual quote by anyone famous quotable, but i like the ring.
I also hate the canteen's doughtnuts. Eugh. Plus the icing. The icing is dead set horrible. Too much sugar to be of any goodness. Back to "real" doughnuts it is.
Hoping you never, ever, eat something as bad and as overpriced for it's value as that.
Wednesday, June 9, 2010
So, I'm not quite sure, anymore.
Does everything need a reason? Yes. Why should everything have a reason? Because without it, what is the point. And i doubt you can find anything that can be done without a reason, because it's rather hard and in my view, undoable.
Which leads to the "what is the reasoning behind life?"
Hoping you don't have any stupid arguements with someone who makes bad analogies.
Which leads to the "what is the reasoning behind life?"
Hoping you don't have any stupid arguements with someone who makes bad analogies.
Tuesday, June 8, 2010
Well, i guess it could be called "Self-Learning"
But i'm not a fan of it, and neither is the wind. Also, the color idea didn't quite work before so i'm going to try this out, just a few times.
So... for a while, i'll be fiddling around with coloring, and i suppose purple on black looks good, but it needs a different font..hmm.
Also, don't blame me for weird colors, i don't really mind, actually, highlight if you must to read.
Although, the flashy colors are quite nice, too.
Hoping you like the color, too. I sure do.
Turns out number fiddling doesn't work. Oh well.
So... for a while, i'll be fiddling around with coloring, and i suppose purple on black looks good, but it needs a different font..hmm.
Also, don't blame me for weird colors, i don't really mind, actually, highlight if you must to read.
Although, the flashy colors are quite nice, too.
Hoping you like the color, too. I sure do.
Turns out number fiddling doesn't work. Oh well.
Monday, June 7, 2010
Was thinking i needed a little color for the page
At least for the next few days.
Though it's funny how "Religious" is counted as a "good" trait. Ha. Religion. Anyway, I apologize for that. Sorry.
Hoping you like the color as well! Better on a black bg, too!
Arena(known to self and others) cynical, impatient, insensitive, callous | Blind Spot(known only to others) intolerant, inflexible, violent, aloof, irresponsible, vulgar, hostile, unhappy, unimaginative, inane, brash, ignorant, distant, childish, blasé, loud, vacuous, unethical, self-satisfied, passive, smug, dispassionate, overdramatic, predictable |
Façade(known only to self) withdrawn, chaotic | Unknown(known to nobody) incompetent, timid, cowardly, glum, stupid, simple, insecure, lethargic, selfish, unhelpful, needy, cruel, irrational, boastful, imperceptive, weak, embarrassed, panicky, rash, dull, inattentive, unreliable, cold, foolish, humourless |
Dominant Traits
77% of people agree that Toan Daxland is cynical
All Percentages
incompetent (0%) intolerant (11%) inflexible (11%) timid (0%) cowardly (0%) violent (11%) aloof (44%) glum (0%) stupid (0%) simple (0%) insecure (0%) irresponsible (11%) vulgar (11%) lethargic (0%) withdrawn (0%) hostile (11%) selfish (0%) unhappy (11%) unhelpful (0%) cynical (77%) needy (0%) unimaginative (11%) inane (22%) brash (22%) cruel (0%) ignorant (11%) irrational (0%) distant (11%) childish (11%) boastful (0%) blasé (33%) imperceptive (0%) chaotic (0%) impatient (22%) weak (0%) embarrassed (0%) loud (33%) vacuous (11%) panicky (0%) unethical (11%) insensitive (22%) self-satisfied (22%) passive (11%) smug (11%) rash (0%) dispassionate (11%) overdramatic (22%) dull (0%) predictable (11%) callous (11%) inattentive (0%) unreliable (0%) cold (0%) foolish (0%) humourless (0%)
Created by the Nohari Window on 7.6.2010, using data from 9 respondents.
You can make your own Nohari Window, or view Toan Daxland's full data.
You can make your own Nohari Window, or view Toan Daxland's full data.
Arena(known to self and others) complex, introverted, proud, spontaneous | Blind Spot(known only to others) able, brave, calm, caring, clever, confident, dependable, energetic, idealistic, independent, intelligent, knowledgeable, logical, observant, reflective, responsive, searching, self-assertive, sensible, witty |
Façade(known only to self) sentimental, shy | Unknown(known to nobody) accepting, adaptable, bold, cheerful, dignified, extroverted, friendly, giving, happy, helpful, ingenious, kind, loving, mature, modest, nervous, organised, patient, powerful, quiet, relaxed, religious, self-conscious, silly, sympathetic, tense, trustworthy, warm, wise |
All Percentages
able (33%) accepting (0%) adaptable (0%) bold (0%) brave (11%) calm (11%) caring (11%) cheerful (0%) clever (44%) complex (22%) confident (44%) dependable (33%) dignified (0%) energetic (11%) extroverted (0%) friendly (0%) giving (0%) happy (0%) helpful (0%) idealistic (33%) independent (22%) ingenious (0%) intelligent (22%) introverted (11%) kind (0%) knowledgeable (44%) logical (22%) loving (0%) mature (0%) modest (0%) nervous (0%) observant (11%) organised (0%) patient (0%) powerful (0%) proud (33%) quiet (0%) reflective (11%) relaxed (0%) religious (0%) responsive (11%) searching (11%) self-assertive (33%) self-conscious (0%) sensible (11%) sentimental (0%) shy (0%) silly (0%) spontaneous (33%) sympathetic (0%) tense (0%) trustworthy (0%) warm (0%) wise (0%) witty (22%)
Created by the Interactive Johari Window on 7.6.2010, using data from 9 respondents.
You can make your own Johari Window, or view Toan Daxland's full data.
You can make your own Johari Window, or view Toan Daxland's full data.
Though it's funny how "Religious" is counted as a "good" trait. Ha. Religion. Anyway, I apologize for that. Sorry.
Hoping you like the color as well! Better on a black bg, too!
Ah, back again to the void. Of nothing.
While there is a lot of things to be done, it's not exactly the most interesting of all stuffs and like foodstuffs, or unlike, or otherwise, not so tasty. So, I'm not sure any more, but i really ought to stop using contractions so much in my essays. Grr..
"John Howard has a purple Afro. Nothing exists outside of the text"
Hoping you can find of more things, plus a panel and maybe plus gay-ness.
"John Howard has a purple Afro. Nothing exists outside of the text"
Hoping you can find of more things, plus a panel and maybe plus gay-ness.
Sunday, June 6, 2010
A new take on some old things.
So there's a poem to be read
Then commented on
And it reminds me of joanne burns's works.
It's all a little bit weird
But it does have some meaning
And its fun to impose my opinion into something
Someone else will read
And it won't matter
Except to me.
"Analyse the value of the text for modern audiences"
Or some variant thereof. It's rather interesting because it clearly says "Analyse", but this doesn't mean anything because the marks don't mean anything either, and thus, i shall follow those guidelines, read the text later; put it on the to-do and carry on. It just means that i have to shove in my opinion of a Catholic or otherwise text and to "analyse" it's value + prove with very vague techniques and so on, till i waffle onto the point, without quotes or lack of thereof, and thus, get to the intended point which is not a delicious waffle, but an undelicious and restrained waffle, as if you got a waffle maker, then added gelatin to your waffle, and out comes the restrained waffle and unbelievably undelicious; almost like marshmallows, but again, nothing like it.
Wheeeeee. Run on sentences from 3rd grade. Love them. Esp. because it makes sense, and yet, is anyone going to read it? I do believe that whole paragraph is...4 sentences? Fulfilling the quota was never so satisfying.
Hoping you finish all the things needed to be done. I can see about 10. Inclusive or otherwise of texts and pondering...
"A student analysed data from a certain hospital and arrived to this conclusion:
"More people die after being admitted to hospital, than those who stay at home."
Is this true? Why/Why not?"
Does that mean to say, a correct answer could be "True, because nothing exists outside of the text"?
Then commented on
And it reminds me of joanne burns's works.
It's all a little bit weird
But it does have some meaning
And its fun to impose my opinion into something
Someone else will read
And it won't matter
Except to me.
"Analyse the value of the text for modern audiences"
Or some variant thereof. It's rather interesting because it clearly says "Analyse", but this doesn't mean anything because the marks don't mean anything either, and thus, i shall follow those guidelines, read the text later; put it on the to-do and carry on. It just means that i have to shove in my opinion of a Catholic or otherwise text and to "analyse" it's value + prove with very vague techniques and so on, till i waffle onto the point, without quotes or lack of thereof, and thus, get to the intended point which is not a delicious waffle, but an undelicious and restrained waffle, as if you got a waffle maker, then added gelatin to your waffle, and out comes the restrained waffle and unbelievably undelicious; almost like marshmallows, but again, nothing like it.
Wheeeeee. Run on sentences from 3rd grade. Love them. Esp. because it makes sense, and yet, is anyone going to read it? I do believe that whole paragraph is...4 sentences? Fulfilling the quota was never so satisfying.
Hoping you finish all the things needed to be done. I can see about 10. Inclusive or otherwise of texts and pondering...
"A student analysed data from a certain hospital and arrived to this conclusion:
"More people die after being admitted to hospital, than those who stay at home."
Is this true? Why/Why not?"
Does that mean to say, a correct answer could be "True, because nothing exists outside of the text"?
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)