A new take on some old things.

So there's a poem to be read
Then commented on
And it reminds me of joanne burns's works.
It's all a little bit weird
But it does have some meaning
And its fun to impose my opinion into something
Someone else will read
And it won't matter
Except to me.

"Analyse the value of the text for modern audiences"

Or some variant thereof. It's rather interesting because it clearly says "Analyse", but this doesn't mean anything because the marks don't mean anything either, and thus, i shall follow those guidelines, read the text later; put it on the to-do and carry on. It just means that i have to shove in my opinion of a Catholic or otherwise text and to "analyse" it's value + prove with very vague techniques and so on, till i waffle onto the point, without quotes or lack of thereof, and thus, get to the intended point which is not a delicious waffle, but an undelicious and restrained waffle, as if you got a waffle maker, then added gelatin to your waffle, and out comes the restrained waffle and unbelievably undelicious; almost like marshmallows, but again, nothing like it.

Wheeeeee. Run on sentences from 3rd grade. Love them. Esp. because it makes sense, and yet, is anyone going to read it? I do believe that whole paragraph is...4 sentences? Fulfilling the quota was never so satisfying.

Hoping you finish all the things needed to be done. I can see about 10. Inclusive or otherwise of texts and pondering...

"A student analysed data from a certain hospital and arrived to this conclusion:
"More people die after being admitted to hospital, than those who stay at home."

Is this true? Why/Why not?"

Does that mean to say, a correct answer could be "True, because nothing exists outside of the text"?