"This goes with this, and this and this and then VOILA. It's done.
.....What?"
Looks like Work Experience is up soon...soon...well, soon enough.
Next week shall be jam packed and full of buttery goodness. Gathering on the 14th, unless something drastic happens, then again on the 15th. So a film + explosives + party + hat which I need to make, but don't have a clue how, and I need to prioritize, which I shall do after I finish writing on and on so as to give the semblance of a coherent musing, and then go do what I wanted to do earlier, which is prioritize.
So perhaps I shall now, or perhaps I shan't and for all we know, everything is changing. How you say? That was my question too. Then if you think about it, perhaps it's not too far from the truth. Perhaps we all wonder, and all those oddballs scheming and changing the tides of things while being consumed in the process. (Reactants not catalysts you see.)
Perhaps it's not making any more sense than usual, so perhaps I shall use a more common example because the media madness is always madness. We shall use the example of Vuvuzela warrior, otherwise known as the bald-ish guy who hates me. Now, because he was mentioned before, perhaps I shall mention him again but with mine own experience. Thus is the story of him getting his prize weapons (Mere toys, not musical instrument nor weapons so calls him.) confiscated by really cool yet stern Commerce God. (Love you Happy Apple. Okay, maybe not, but it's really inspiring.) and then "standing his ground" and getting them back somehow. Then bragging about it all. I do have a neat passage, and maybe one of these days, I'll be angered enough to do something about it. Quietly of course. But you'll know when it happens. In the meantime.
"In his soul we do not find sham attitudes, he does not embellish and puff up the experiences which he truly has, he does not twist his gaze back on himself instead of looking at the object which demands a response of him. He is the genuine and straightforward man, i.e. the objective man in the highest sense of that word."
I love this text actually. It's quite good despite a few Christian notions here and there, but still very very good. Like the Art of War, but much much less flexible. Which helps.
http://www.ewtn.com/library/THEOLOGY/FUNMOR.HTM#3
Hoping to get to read it sometime. (Consider it MY "Catcher in the Rye", only 50x more accessible.)
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
Reading someone else's argument and takings someone else's argument for granted because it's easy to accept morals pushed onto you from an anonymous source isn't a good idea. I mean, you might as well take Kyle Williams' "I don't have enough faith to be a christian" and turn it into the Atheist Bible.
No, it's re-interpreting it.
haha, "commerce god"
I don't believe it matters whether you interpret preset morals how you feel like interpreting them or take them at face value. Whatever it is, it's not what you're meant to be doing, which is deriving morals from personal experience. Unless you believe in objective morality, if so you should become a Christian/other religion w/ objective morals. You can't remain suitably atheistic without the whole personal moral thing.
Post a Comment